Mediation Services

Mediation Services

What is Mediation?


Find out what mediation is and how it can help you

Mediation is no more than a confidential, managed business discussion between parties in dispute, chaired by a mediator who can bring knowledge and experience of the relevant industrial sector to bear in helping to find solutions to disputes for parties who have more productive things to do with their time than spending 3 to 5 years litigating in the state courts.


Mediation is not about judging who is right. It is a process to determine what is right to enable the parties to move forward. A Mediator will bring his interpersonal skills coupled with experience in mediation process techniques. These include active listening  and discerning common ground, either within the facts of the dispute or in the wider business environment. The essence of mediation is not to take on the stated positions of the disputing parties but to explore avenues and areas of common interest which, if pursued, can address the interests behind the positions taken and lead to successful resolution.

The process is confidential, private and cannot legitimately be used as a source for evidence gathering or furthering litigation. It is a flexible process with the managed discussion taking place in person, online or through an appropriate and agreed hybrid process.


As a mediator I cannot and will not offer legal or commercial advice. I can however reality test arguments which are raised and cause the parties to reflect upon stated positions. As an Arbitrator I must make decisions based on credible evidence. As a Mediator, subject to what I say about evaluative mediation below, I neither weigh evidence nor make decisions. Resolution is in the hands of the parties. My role as a mediator is to guide the parties to the real issues in disputes and suggest how their respective interests behind stated positions can be addressed.

 

Contact Me

Key elements about mediation explained...

  • Who is typically involved in a Mediation?

    The key people involved with Mediation are the parties who are involved in the conflict or dispute. You may have a representative such as a lawyer or Mediation Advocate, or a friend. The person representing each party must be equipped with the authority to make decisions which may become binding on them. This is something you will be required to confirm in the Mediation Agreement.


    Your mediator is likely to have been instructed by one of the parties or a professional advisor such as a lawyer. Third parties (people not involved with the mediation) are not permitted to know the details of any conversations you hold with your mediator or other party. Your mediator will not disclose anything without the prior written permission of all parties. This provides you with a substantive opportunity to explore thoughts, feelings, concerns, and frustrations in an open forum with each other without any other people knowing.  


    Confidentiality and privacy are key to mediation. The Mediation Agreement, signed before the mediation meeting will require (amongst other matters) absolute confidentiality to the extent nothing learned during the process may be disclosed in any subsequent proceedings. It is a safe environment in which to laterally explore solutions and exit strategies.


  • How does a Mediation work?

    Mediation is a process which starts by understanding and exploring the issues and following through to reaching an agreement. You may need only a day or a few sessions over a month depending on the nature and complexity of the issues and availability to hold meetings. 


    Your mediator will start by speaking to each person involved and explore what the issues are. They will hold confidential conversations, usually remotely by telephone or by Zoom, and this is your first opportunity to tell them what has been happening. Your mediator will not disclose anything you say to anyone else unless you ask them to. 


    Once your mediator has had the initial calls with each party, they will help you get ready for the session. This will include anything to prepare ahead of the day, where everything will take place, and who will be attending. Let your mediator know if you need support leading up to or during the session. 


    There may be a need for some Conflict Coaching to help each party better understand how to communicate and add the most value to the mediation session. You mediator will discuss this with you. These sessions will take place before your mediation session and will be held on a one-to-one and confidential basis. 


    Once a date has been set, your mediator will meet you at the venue, if this is in person. Ideally, there will be three rooms. Once for each party and a central meeting space (which your mediator will use too). This will provide you with a confidential space to think and reflect on your position and how you want to move forward, and a shared space for you to have conversations with the other party.  


    The aim of the mediation session is to help each party move forward. This may take a couple of hours or a whole day. The time needed depends on the willingness of those involved to make compromises and to agree outcomes. 

    A typical mediation will be divided into private sessions and joint sessions. Your mediator may use a mixture of these depending on what is appropriate in the circumstances. They will invite you to agree who will proceed with talking first and involve you in how you want the mediation session to take place. If you have any particular requirements or support needs, please let your mediator know as soon as possible so that they can accommodate these. 


    Once the mediation has concluded, your mediator will explain the next steps. At the end of the mediation session, you may have agreed your way forward. This may include elements such as how and when you communicate with each other; agreed apologies or expressions of regret; and whether any other formal processes are to be engaged with or stopped. 


    Your mediator will schedule a follow-up with you at an appropriate time. This will be to check on progress of any agreed terms, and whether an agreement has been reached after the mediation (this sometimes happens). In each respect, your mediator will ask if you need any further support such as Conflict Coaching, training, or a further mediation session. 


  • Is a Mediation Agreement legally binding and can you enforce the agreement?

    Your mediation agreement takes the form of some key actions with dates and explains who is responsible for each action. Except for confidentiality and payment of mediation fees, this is not a legally binding agreement. Enforcement of such agreements is not usually an issue. Parties tend to stick to the terms agreed because they have reached them of their own accord. 


    The Settlement Agreement reached following a successful mediation is enforceable in accordance with its terms. You may be able to get a consent court order or arbitration award based on the Settlement Agreement.


    Describe the item or answer the question so that site visitors who are interested get more information. You can emphasize this text with bullets, italics or bold, and add links.

  • Facilitative, Evaluative Mediation and other Forms of Mediation

    Most western mediation teaching concentrates on the facilitative form where a mediator facilitates and uncovers the parties’ real concerns in the endeavour to bridge the distance between the parties and their respective positions to the extent that a commercial settlement really makes sense as the least bad alternative to litigation.


    Other forms of mediation are given names such as evaluative and transformative. Transformative mediation is about reducing power imbalances and has particular application in workplace disputes. Evaluative mediations require the mediator to give an indication of the strengths and weaknesses of the parties’ respective positions where both parties agree. In this sense an evaluative mediation can be more akin to an Expert Determination. 


    Whilst I have done some workplace mediation at the higher echelons of international corporates it is not my preferred medium. On the other hand I have mediated disputes in cases where the parties did want an indication of their respective positions to provide a basis for direct negotiations in very successful ways. In a case where the leaders of the Contractor Consortium and the Employer were at school together in their childhood and did not want to face each other, even vicariously through expensive law firms, in a dispute in their hometown an evaluated mediation reduced the areas of difference between them and allowed a commercial settlement to ensue.


    An evaluation of the merits of the parties’ respective cases can only be given where both parties agree to that approach. Such evaluation will necessarily be non-binding and advisory only. If a binding decision is required then the best approach is to seek such through formal arbitration.



  • In Person, Online and Hybrid Mediation

    The Pandemic has validated digital environments other than in person meetings. My experience is online mediation takes longer but is no less effective. 


    Recently I mediated a shareholders’ dispute with parties in Australasia, North Asia and the Middle East. If we had sat down together in Singapore, then I estimated 3 days to resolve matters. The online mediation took 80 hours over 3 weeks but was nonetheless successful. No party incurred travel or hotel costs which more than offset the increase in fee costs. It did mean I became accustomed to night shift working! It is of course possible to design a procedure which both parties are happy with, be that in person, online or hybrid. 

  • How much does a Mediation cost and who pays?

    My fees are £250 per party, per hour. This fee is paid by the parties in advance. The fee will include the session, and estimated preparation time. If more time is needed your mediator will discuss this with you. 

  • Do lawyers need to be involved with a Mediation?

    It is not necessary for lawyers to be in attendance at mediation. However, if you wish for your lawyer to be present, they can advise and support you throughout. 


    Mediation is more successful where the parties engage fully and without their legal advisors speaking on their behalf. Finding a good balance between legal support and party engagement is paramount to the success of lawyer-attended mediations. 

  • What are the alternatives to having a Mediation?

    If the issues cannot be resolved in mediation, the issue may require intervention by a third party such as using Expert Determination, Adjudication, or traditional litigation. 


    These other routes to resolve your issues are usually more expensive and time consuming and will likely result in a win-lose scenario for one or more parties. Mediation is the best way to agree mutual outcomes and achieve resolution. 


    If you believe that your legal rights are affected by any of the issues you are facing, you should seek legal or professional advice about your situation. 

    If you would like some assistance with dealing with the issues without resorting to formal processes and procedures, you can speak to your mediator about Conflict Coaching to help you self-manage the situation. 


  • What happens if not everyone wants to engage with a Mediation?

    Mediation can only succeed whereby everyone involved agrees to proceed and acts in good faith to find a resolution. If one or more parties do not engage properly, mediation is not suitable. 

    Failure to accede to a good faith offer of mediation can affect the cost outcome to the extent a party refusing mediation may win the case but have to pay the entire costs of proceedings. The English courts in particular retain a great deal of discretion over the award of costs in such circumstances

    Conflict Coaching may help individuals manage conflict, alternatively, you may need to seek professional advice as to your next steps. 


  • Mediation Advocacy

    If you do not have a lawyer but would benefit from advocacy, I offer mediation advocacy. The role of your Mediation Advocate is to support you and provide a voice where you may struggle if you are entirely on your own. Please talk to your mediator about this service.

Is mediation right for my matter?


Mediation does not judge who is right but rather seeks the right solution to address the issues confronting the parties. Mediation is not a panacea, nor is it the answer to every dispute on every occasion.


It may not help in cases where a party is bankrupt or is so emotionally attached to a claim or defence that defies logic. Occasionally a party simply does not want to settle and wants to have a day in court. In cases where one party demonstrates illogical behaviour mediation can however help to unravel a party’s position enabling an alternative but acceptable solution.


An example I give to students involves a large European Corporate ‘A’ and its Asian franchisee ‘B’. All the evidence pointed to some €30m being owed as commission but no payment was forthcoming sparking litigation in at least two jurisdictions. In confidential sessions A’s CEO confided the money was owed but would require reported accounts to be adjusted leading to reputational damage. I was able to enter B’s mediation room, with appropriate consents, bearing the bad news that I could not get their €30m back but I could get them a special commission, training and other grants to the same value with interest over 12 months. The suggestion was accepted, the details worked out and the dispute resolved by a legally binding settlement agreement.

What makes a successful mediation?


There are many elements which guide the process to successful conclusions. Each mediation is special, and each party is different.


All parties will have an undisclosed agenda which drives them in mediations. It may just be the risk of having to pay costs in a state court if mediation is not attempted or there may be a genuine desire to settle. It is the Mediator’s job to unravel and uncover these hidden agendas so the real problems can be addressed. The following are some of the hidden agenda items most frequently encountered:


  • Either or both parties looking for an off ramp on their litigation journey
  • Realisation that the cost of litigation outweighs any benefit of winning
  • Decision makers in the same room with the staff or directors who caused the problems restrained from leading the discussions
  • Reputational issues and the need to maintain tight confidentiality
  • Relationship issues and the prospect of future business
  • A willingness to compromise or at least accept the least bad solution
  • A desire to use available funds to settle rather than fund expensive legal advisors
  • Diminishing emotional attachment to a claim or defence over time or in the face of cold logic
  • The passage of time and the desire to move onward and make rather than expend money
  • Change in management or policy
  • Commercial needs

 

What makes a successful Mediator?


All trained mediators bring their own personality, knowledge and experience to bear on a given case. Soft interpersonal skills are in my view the most important. Encouraging the parties to trust the mediator and the process whilst placing the parties in a safe environment so they will open up to allow different routes to settlement to be explored. Similarly, a mediator who has knowledge of the industrial sector and knows the vocabulary will add value.


Whether the parties chose a Businessperson, Engineer, Accountant or Lawyer is a matter for them. In shipping disputes appointing someone who is unaware of the 4 decades long discussion in the English Courts as to what constitutes laytime and an ‘arrived ship‘ may need educating by the parties. This is not at all desirable. Similarly in offshore wind disputes understanding the role and function of Monopiles in relation to Transition Pieces and the documented problems which have been resolved by the courts may well be relevant. In professional negligence cases an understanding of whether and when economic loss is recoverable may be of great assistance.


Where the parties or their advisors choose the mediator, reputation can influence choice.  Where a third party is to appoint the mediator the parties can set out their requirements and suggest to an appointing authority that the Mediator must, for example, be a Chartered Engineer with at least 20 years’ experience in hydroelectric projects in South America. Clearly a residential surveyor based in London would not be appropriate in fit for purpose claims arising in Paraguay but may well be the go to person for defective property in England.


My advice is to consider, chose and specify the attributes you require to help resolve your case. You will not always get what you want, and some attributes may be unavailable and more in the nature of nice to have rather than need to have. Do your own due diligence and work out what really is necessary and what characteristics you really need a mediator to have .

 

Share by: